martes, 13 de octubre de 2009

Our Faculty problems


Today we have three mainly problems: the infrastructure, the curriculum net and some bad teachers.
In the first thing, The library must be improved urgently ¿why? Well here we go, we don’t have any place to study in silence, our study area is noisy, and it doesn’t have enough tables and enough space for all the students. Moreover, this library doesn’t have enough books, many times doesn’t have the basic introduction books in consecuense we have to buy the photocopys and spend a lot of money. Our classroms are quite small and suddenly don’t have enough chairs. We even don’t have good laboratorys to, the place to realizated research experiments are quite poor.
However, recently have been a little improve, the administration of our faculty bought several new and fast computers, with ergonomic chairs, and that is something that we have to appreciate.
The second thing: the curriculum net. All the years there are changes in the order of the subjects, some are deleted and some appointed. There are teachers and student working in the development of the anthropologist profile, but this isn’t finished yet.
The third thing: teachers. We have had awful teachers in subjects quite importants, not very demanding and very lazy in some cases. I think that every faculty must have the best teachers, because the discipline is composed of the research and the works of the teachers, so, I consider more important that everything-infraestructure, curriculum net- have the best teachers. But, we have a quite effective tool “the docent evaluation”, that is composed of two cualitative and cuantitative part. This have been useful to fire the worst teachers, and that’s good.
Anyway, we have many kind of problems, but all of this is investigated and is known. In this way with the MECESUP proyect is expect to improved all of this problems and today is developing.
However, many arguments have emerged of these days, because some missed deadline, but that is another problem.

2 comentarios:

  1. Today we have three mainly problems: the infrastructure, the curriculum WW net and some bad teachers.
    In the first thing, The library must be improved urgently ¿why? Well here we go, we don’t have any place to study in silence, our study area is noisy, and it doesn’t have enough tables and enough space for all the students. Moreover, this library doesn’t have enough books, many times doesn’t have the basic WF introduction books in SP consecuense we have to buy the WF photocopys and spend a lot of money. Our classroms are quite small and suddenly don’t have enough chairs. We even don’t have good WF laboratorys to, the place to WW realizated research experiments are quite poor.
    However, recently have been a little improve, the administration of our faculty bought several new and fast computers, with ergonomic chairs, and that is something that we have to appreciate.
    The second thing: the curriculum net. All the years there are changes in the order of the subjects, some are deleted and some appointed. There are teachers and student working in the development of the anthropologist profile, but this isn’t finished yet.
    The third thing: teachers. We have had awful teachers in subjects quite importants, not very demanding and very lazy in some cases. I think that every faculty must have the best teachers, because the discipline is composed of the research and the works of the teachers, so, I consider more important that everything-infraestructure, curriculum net- have the best teachers. But, we have a quite effective tool “WW the docent evaluation”, that is composed of two cualitative and SP cuantitative part. This have been useful to fire the worst teachers, and that’s good.
    Anyway, we have many kind of problems, but all of this is investigated and is known. In this way with the MECESUP proyect is expect to improved all of this problems and today is developing.
    However, many arguments have emerged of these days, because some missed deadline, but that is another problem.

    well I agree in some demands but since i'm a teacher I also demand the best students! and not only the ones who could get into the university.

    regards,
    miss

    p.s. you got a6

    ResponderEliminar
  2. I totally agree with you. University quality is composed by both, teacher and students efford.

    ResponderEliminar